Tags: eggs

Buy these great books! Published by me at Norton Creek Press.


Fresh-Air Poultry Houses

by Prince T. Woods
More Information

Success With Baby Chicks

by Robert Plamondon
More Information

One Survivor

by Robert Plamondon
More Information

Ten Acres Enough

by Edmund Morris
More Information

Tom Slade, Boy Scout

by Percy K. Fitzhugh
More Information

Harvest Season vs. Seasonal Egg Decline

by Robert

It's harvest season on the farmers' markets are packed. Hooray! Hey, where did all the eggs go?

Last week, for the first time this year, I ran out of eggs before the farmer's market closed.

One of the sad things about being in the free-range egg business is that the seasonal peak in egg production (April and May) is horrendously mismatched with the seasonal peak in farmer's market customers (August and September).

This is a hard problem without a very good solution. (Telling people that they should buy a whole fryer instead of eggs, because a chicken is nothing but an experienced egg, doesn't work!) It's made even more difficult because demand slackens after September, and it's hard to engineer a two-month egg peak in the wrong season.

So it works out the same as always: get to the market early for the best selection. You snooze, you lose. That's true of everything, not just my eggs.

No feedback yet

What's it Take to Eliminate Factory-Farmed Eggs?

by Robert

Let's do the math. There were 76 billion eggs laid by US chickens last year (not counting hatching eggs), laid by 280 million hens (23 dozen eggs per hen). The vast majority of these hens are in factory farms. Suppose we wanted to get rid of factory farms. What would it take?

Well, before factory farms there were ordinary farm flocks. Between about 1900 and 1950, a typical "egg farm" held steady at about 1,500 hens. Some had more, some had less, but a farm family making most of its income from eggs typically had a 1,500-hen operation.

This makes sense when you realize that studies of labor efficiency on old-fashioned egg farms measured productivity at 2.0-2.5 hours per hen per year. A 1,500-hen operation would take between 3,000 and 3,750 hours of labor, which will soak up the time of two wage-earners.

Factory-farm techniques allowed the number of hens per attendant to increase to the current astronomical levels (around 150,000 birds per henhouse, with multiple houses per installation, and only one attendant per henhouse.)

280,000,000/1,500 = is about 187,000 egg farms that would have to be created, providing jobs for 187,000 new farm families. A 1,500-hen flock should lay (at 23 dozen eggs/hen) 34,500 dozen eggs per year.

Now, the median household income last year was about $50,000. Presumably, we can't get rid of factory farms without paying an average wage, so we need to extract $50,000 of wage income per 1,500 bird flock. $50,000/$34,500 = $1.45 per dozen (as opposed to only about $0.0145 per dozen for the factory farm). That pays the farmer. Because the farmer only receives about half the retail price of the eggs, the consumer will have to pay about $2.90 extra for non-factory-farmed eggs.

This cost premium is more than the price of a dozen factory-farmed eggs (around $2.25 the last time I looked). Various other economies of scale that benefit factory farms won't be available to smaller farms, so I figure that, in rough terms, non-factory-farmed eggs will triple the cost -- in round numbers, $7.00 a dozen.

That's for old-time confinement operations, which would have eggs that taste just as bad as factory-farmed eggs. Real free range eggs (not the fake kind that produces the eggs in the stores) cost more to produce. The labor efficiency isn't that much worse, but production plummets in poor weather and there are predator issues. I figure that the costs will work out to around five times as much as factory-farmed eggs -- $10-$12 a dozen.

True free-range farmers are thin enough on the ground that most of them can sell all their eggs locally, which is why you can't get them in the city. Eggs are cheaper in the country, so eggs you buy from me for $5 would cost you $10 in the big city.

No feedback yet

Why We Don't Eat Eggs at Thanksgiving

by Robert

Chickens have a natural laying cycle that peaks in the spring and troughs in the fall. The typical flock is at its worst in November, and actually lays better in the depths of winter.

By early spring, long before the weather is nice or the supply of natural food has increased much, the hens start laying like crazy. It's not about temperature and it's not about food: it's about natural cycles. The hens lay their eggs before the food supply is very good because it's the growing chicks who need easy pickings, not the broody hen, who hardly eats anything when she's incubating her eggs, anyway. So the natural egg-laying season has to happen before the time of plenty.

In the fall, the pickings are still pretty easy, but what would baby chicks eat during the upcoming season of scarcity? So the natural tendency is for egg-laying to cease.

This means that Thanksgiving is an unlikely time to feature egg-based dishes, while Easter is a great time. Similarly, farm flocks are thinned in the fall so that only the most valuable animals are kept over the winter, so it's a good time for a turkey dinner. At Easter, it would be madness to slaughter turkeys, because the whole point of keeping your remaining turkeys over the winter was so they'd lay hatching eggs in the spring, and Easter happens before this is truly under way.

I get emails from people every November, wondering why their hens stopped laying, and what they can do about it. This is one of those problems where anything you do will work, because the rate of lay will pick up in a couple of months even if you don't do anything. But giving the hens all the chicken feed they want, housing them in an area that's reasonably dry and more or less out of the wind, and preventing predators, pets, and children from hassling them will help.

The natural tendency for the number of eggs to increase right through the winter is another piece of evidence that, whatever their origins, chickens aren't tropical birds anymore. They're far more winter-hardy than most people give them credit for.

1 comment

Comment from: nancy [Visitor]
so what do hens in south america due?
11/19/08 @ 09:57

Why There Aren't Any "Real" Free-Range Eggs in the City

by Robert

I'm sure you've noticed that real, grass-fed free-range eggs aren't available in city supermarkets, and that they're pretty rare even in the country. Not only that, but the few farmers who produce them rarely expand their operations. At best, they keep the same number of chickens every year.

This has been true for ages. Why?

The answer is that free-range eggs aren't very profitable. Anyone who can make a buck from free-range eggs can make two bucks doing something else. If this weren't true, the farmers would be expanding their flocks as fast as they could.

Why isn't it profitable? Because consumers aren't willing to pay what it would cost. By my calculations, real grass-fed free-range eggs would need to retail for about $10 per dozen in city supermarkets for the farmers to earn a living equal to the U.S. median family income. Of this $10 per dozen, the farmer would receive about half, while wholesalers and retailers would get the other half. (That's how it always works.)

Out of the farmer's half, most goes to expenses -- feed, interest, depreciation, equipment, replacement chickens -- and only $1.69 per dozen goes to paying the farmer's wages.

(I'll post the assumptions and the calculations later, but in this post I want to cut to the chase.)

People can complain about factory farming as much as they like, but until they are willing to pay $10 a dozen for eggs, factory-farmed products are what they're gonna get. You've basically got your choice between factory farms that uses cages and ones that don't, and factory farms that are organically certified and ones that aren't.

If you buy 'em in the city, non-factory-farmed eggs are gonna cost you ten bucks. Activism will have no effect on this whatever. Farmers deserve to get paid, and so do the wholesalers and retailers. Real free-range eggs are expensive to raise. Nothing real will happen until enough people put their money where their mouth is. Ten bucks a dozen.

5 comments

Comment from: Bea Elliott [Visitor]
There also is a 3rd option - a very logical one... Eliminate eggs (and dairy) from your diet. A plant based diet is healthier for humans, better for the planet and certainly better for the animals. For health & heart - Go Vegan
10/20/08 @ 03:56
Comment from: Robert [Member] · http://www.plamondon.com
I can't even mow my pasture without killing some field mice and leaving others exposed to predators. If I were to plow it up instead so I could plant soybeans, I'd kill far more animals, both directly and through habitat destruction. So the idea that vegetarianism involves less killing doesn't hold water.

The amount of killing and habitat destruction involved in farming (even on a small scale) is so obvious that vegetarians weird me out. How can they act as if this isn't happening?
10/20/08 @ 06:52
Comment from: Pam [Visitor]
Why is it that "heart healthy" vegetable oils have practically replaced the old fashioned oils like lard, butter and tropical oils and yet obesity is on the rise in this country? Veganism and vegetarianism is on the rise with a corresponding rise in cancer and digestive disorders. A plant based diet is not healthy for humans as we are omnivores, not herbivores. I guess vegetarians don't realize that they are made of meat and to replenish the proteins and fat-soluble vitamins that we use up we need animal fats and proteins. Not to mention, veganism is not sustainable. Animals are necessary to grow organic produce and too many animals just defeats the process. Go meat!

10/20/08 @ 15:42
Comment from: Mark Fox [Visitor]
****-
It always shocks me to see just how expensive sustainable and healthy food should be. Since I try to produce much of my own, I believe it. It's a shame, because I used to believe that food could be produced sustainably for less than the alternatives. Alas, it isn't true (except in the long view).

Bea, the environmental reality of veganism was made clear to me the day I dug a small garden plot in land that was formerly pasture. There is no comparison. The grazed pasture has more biodiversity, is more robust in face of drought, is less susceptible to erosion, is friendlier to wild-life, and is a whole lot less work to keep productive. The fact that a diet containing some meat can have a smaller environmental foot-print is also interesting. (A recent paper by Cornell researchers found this to be the case.)

Which isn't to defend factory farming. Not at all.
10/29/08 @ 14:03
Comment from: Robert [Member] · http://www.plamondon.com
Mark,

100 years ago, the average consumer was spending 50% of his income on food, while now it's less than 10%. This gives us a rule of thumb that food raised by old-fashioned methods should be 5x more expensive. That's not the answer anyone wants to hear, but it seems to match reality pretty well.

It also means that, 100 years ago, you could cut your living expenses in half by raising your own food, but nowadays you can't.

I agree about permanent pasture being almost magical from an environmental standpoint. Herding cultures displace part of the native herbivores with domesticated ones, but cause very little environmental change. Ditto hunting cultures if they don't overhunt. Farming is much more invasive. Not that I have anything against farming, but, like everything else, it's no panacea.
10/29/08 @ 16:05